State Rep. Kathy Rapp | Pennsylvania 65th Legislative District
State Rep. Kathy Rapp | Pennsylvania 65th Legislative District
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ordered the Commonwealth Court to determine the constitutionality of the prohibition on taxpayer-funded abortions. Currently, abortions in Pennsylvania are legal for any reason up to 24 weeks, but under the state's Medicaid program, they are only covered in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger.
Reps. Kathy L. Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest) and Kate Klunk (R-Hanover), co-chairs of the Pro Life Caucus, issued a statement in response to the court's decision. They clarified that this ruling does not mean that Pennsylvanians' tax dollars will be used to fund all abortions in the state, as it does not change the current Medicaid coverage guidelines.
However, Rapp and Klunk expressed concerns about the administration's intentions to liberalize the state's abortion laws, and they believe that this case is another attempt to do so. They stated that the majority of citizens do not want their tax money funding abortions.
The representatives also pointed out that this case is not about whether abortion is a constitutional right, but rather about the constitutionality of taxpayer-funded abortions. They referenced a unanimous opinion by the PA Supreme Court in 1985, which they believe should not be disturbed.
Rapp and Klunk emphasized the importance of allowing the litigation process to reach its conclusion before deciding on their next steps. They assured the public that they will continue to monitor the case until a final decision is made by the court. They also pledged to continue fighting for the women, children, and families of Pennsylvania.
It is clear that this is a contentious issue with strong opinions on both sides. The court's decision to have the Commonwealth Court determine the constitutionality of taxpayer-funded abortions will have significant implications for the state. The outcome of this case will shape the future of abortion coverage in Pennsylvania and will undoubtedly fuel further debate and discussion on the topic.